By Ry Rivard
Within the next five years, pretty much everyone in the North Country with an interest in fishing would like to see salmon breeding in the Saranac River for the first time in two centuries.
But the structurally unsound and long-unused Imperial Dam stands in their way. The Plattsburgh-area dam stands between salmon stocked in Lake Champlain and salmon’s ancestral breeding ground in a 13-mile stretch of the Saranac.
The dam is now stuck in a legal limbo that began more than 30 years ago.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
Dams in Plattsburgh have a controversial history. The first ones, put up by the city’s founder, were supposed to be low enough for salmon to get over or to have ramps for salmon to swim up on their way to upstream breeding grounds where they could make gravel nests in riverbeds.
That didn’t happen, though. Thanks to a court ruling in 1819 — yes, 201 years ago — dams on the river were allowed to block salmon, despite a state law to the contrary. Wild Atlantic salmon were last seen in the river some five years later.
By the mid-1800s, all the wild salmon in Lake Champlain were gone too. It would take generations of regret and years of experimental breeding by the government to return stocked salmon to the lake in the 1970s.
Now, some of the Saranac River’s best fishing sits at the foot of Imperial Dam, where hatchery-bred salmon congregate. But the salmon there are stuck, just shy of where they might breed.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
“The damn fish can’t get there up over Imperial Dam,” said Don Lee, one of the founders of the local chapter of Trout Unlimited.
So, while hatchery salmon of Lake Champlain provide a rush for anglers, those fish stand little chance of doing much beyond being caught or dying childless in the lake — unless something is done to breach the dam or allow fish to pass over it.
In 1987, energy regulators made a major decision that seemed like it would settle the matter.
The then-owner of the dam and an adjacent industrial park went to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for permission to keep using the dam to generate hydroelectricity for the industrial park. The dam had been used for hydroelectricity since at least 1918 but had escaped federal scrutiny.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
The commission said the owner could only use the dam to generate power if the dam also had a fish ladder on it to allow salmon to pass through.
Instead of upgrading the dam, the hydroelectric turbines went idle. Now the dam just sits and is considered “unsound” and “unsafe,” according to state dam safety records.
The dam has also changed hands in the complicated ways that old commercial property often does. Now it’s owned by California-based Main Mill Street Investments and, oddly, the state of New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation.
The DEC became part owner of the dam after New York voters approved Gov. George Pataki’s 1996 bond to pay for environmental projects. One of the projects they were sold was a fish ladder on the Imperial Dam.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
In 2012, it seemed as if a plan for a fish ladder was imminent, so likely and so inevitable that the DEC wrote a letter to the owner of the Kent Falls Dam, which is farther upstream from Imperial and where salmon are believed to have bred in the old days. DEC said when salmon returned to the Saranac — possibly that very year — the owners of Kent Falls had better be ready to release more water so the salmon would have enough to swim and breed.
Another dam on the Saranac is also ready for salmon. Treadwell Mills has installed a fish ladder that sits idly awaiting the return of salmon.
But the Imperial Dam still isn’t. The state hasn’t had luck getting things done there, even though it has wanted to get fish past the dam as much as anyone because of the benefits for the Saranac and for Lake Champlain.
“By doing that we’ll be bringing the lake back into a better balance,” Robert Fiorentino, a state fisheries manager, told a group of Clinton County lawmakers this summer.
Several of his predecessors have tried and failed to get salmon into the Saranac. Though Fiorentino hopes to succeed where they have failed, the past failures have come in unexpected and somewhat stupefying ways.
At one point, DEC butted heads with federal water regulators in ways that are both comic and tragic. State officials wanted to lower the whole dam to make it easier for salmon to get by, but to do that the state would have needed to dredge part of the river to remove sediment that builds up behind any dam.
Ironically, returning the river to something closer to its natural state triggered regulatory worries from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which is tasked with protecting the nation’s wetlands, including the artificial wetlands created by dams
The state spent $1 million on consultant fees trying to figure out how to make the project happen, then went back to the drawing board to come up with a plan it rolled out this summer.
DEC’s new $6 million plan maintains the elevation of the dam’s spillway and includes very little sediment removal, which officials there hope will make the project easier to do.
But now officials are running into criticism that they’re helping to subsidize the other owner of the dam, Main Mill Street. The company is working with another developer that is hoping to generate power there again, but the power developer admits that won’t be profitable unless the state helps pay for a fish ladder.
The DEC, which is owner or part owner of at least two other unsafe dams, said as part owner of the Imperial Dam it is responsible for ensuring the dam’s safety. The department wants to make it safer and install the fish ladder, once and for all.
Trout Unlimited is among the environmental groups that question what DEC is doing there. They’d rather see the whole dam removed now.
The state says that would cost $30 million — five times as much as fixing it.
evan clermont says
i think that they should keep the dam but make changes to it like not make it as big or if they can find a different and effective way of creating hydroelectric power or can find a different place to put it that doesnt effect the salmon so much because weve been breeding lots of types of animals which isnt the best for its species and its causing economic problems to.
Dawn Slubowski says
I think they should leave it there and build a fish ladder. They can make there energy some where that they wont bother any animal. The fish ladder I think should be paid for by the owner. He was the one who is causing the problem.
Quinn Roth says
In my honest opinion I believe that the damn should be removed and moved to a different more effective location where it doesn’t harm the natural environment of the salmon as drastically. I think that the owner of the damn should pay for all the problems that have been made and build the damn over again in a better location. So, basically in conclusion my ideas of this plan may feel extreme, but I believe it will be very effective.
Dana says
I think that we should leave the dam there, but also insert a fish ladder along with it. Fish are as much important as electricity, or maybe even more so. If they install a fish ladder for the damn, everybody wins. Bu of course, there’s money. I think the DEC, and anyone else who is so intent on allowing the salmon upstream, should pay the money.
George Dejesus says
I think the DEC should keep the dam and make the fish ladder because then it’s fair for everybody, Fish would be able to get to past the dam and it can also stay. Although I also think since the DEC basically owns the dam, they should pay for the fish ladder.
Colby W. says
I think they should keep the dam and make a path way designated for the salmon or have some sort of system with some workers to grab them and put them on the higher level of the dam.
Laurelie says
I agree with Evan Cleramont they should keep the dam but make changes.
Daniel Alexis says
I think that the DEC should leave the dam there, but make a ladder or a path so the fish can get through. It would cost less money than taking the whole thing down, and the fish would still get to the Saranac River safely.
I also think the DEC should pay for the fish ladder, because they pretty much own the dam.
austin fletcher says
the people who built the dam need to pay for the salmon
austin fletcher says
fishermen need to pay for the salmon
Elijah Adams says
I think we need a fish ladder we should make a fund raiser so we can all pay for the fish ladder and when it is built we can have a big festavil
Elijah Adams says
WE NEED A FISH LADDER!!! We could make a fud raiser
sophia amaya says
I think they should leave the dam there, but make some way like a path or tunnel so the fish can get through. it would be less expensive than to take the whole thing down. they should just make a few changes and they would be good.
Carlos Taylor says
I believe that we should add the fish ladder. This could help solve many problems. The fish ladder would help the fish breed, would increase the population for the fisherman and keeping the dam would help businessmen looking to use the electricity. To pay for it, maybe they could hold a fundraiser to help with the cost of it. The fishermen and citizens who want the fish ladder could also volunteer to help install it. Maybe if everyone works together their problems will be solved.
matthew s says
i think we should place a fish ladder so that the salmon can travel to the other side of the dam. if we place a fish ladder there, the city won’t flood, and the salmon can go up and downstream. if we removed the dam, the city would become ruins.
rickyg522 says
Are you a hydrogeologist? I can’t imagine a returning the river to its former natural state will result in “ruin”.