Lake manager says 30-day look at bays treated with ProcellaCOR are showing dead milfoil, green natives
By Zachary Matson
Thirty days after the first chemical control of invasive plants on Lake George, divers assessing two bays treated with herbicide found dead Eurasian watermilfoil and growing native plants on the lake bottom, just as prescribed.
Staffers with the Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District on Tuesday joined Dave Wick, executive director of the the Lake George Park Commission, and a representative of the herbicide manufacturer for a 30-day-post-treatment qualitative plant survey at the two northern basin bays the commission used as demonstration sites for ProcellaCOR treatments that targeted the invasive milfoil.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
Swimming across the demonstration sites, each about 4 acres in size, the team recorded native plants and their density. They also documented the state of milfoil within the sites, taking underwater photographs and videos.
Most Eurasian watermilfoil was killed, completely deteriorated in some places and turned to little brown stems in other places.
At the Blairs Bay site, a dense milfoil bed on the northern edge of the treatment zone was still partly green but flopped over on itself. Wick’s group hoped the milfoil would die in coming weeks.
The divers were buoyed by the presence of native plants in areas they had been previously and in areas once dominated by milfoil. The native plants support fish and other wildlife and the healthy functioning of the lake.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
“Bringing back the native ecology, that’s exactly what the project is about,” Wick said. “Take the cancer out of the system and let the rest recover.”
The Warren County divers will return for a formal quantitative survey in August, recording the plants found in locations also surveyed in 2021 using the same methods. That survey is required under the state permits approving the project.
As it evaluates the outcomes of the June herbicide treatments — at Blairs Bay and Jeliffe-Knight Bay, near Huletts Landing — the lake commission is also weighing where, when and whether to use the herbicide next.
Representatives of the Adirondack Park Agency plan to visit Lake George this month to assess three potential sites for the next herbicide treatment: Harris Bay in the southern basin; Sunset Bay, just north of Huletts Landing in the northern basin; and Hague Brook delta, also in the northern basin.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
While the APA visit would be necessary for a permit for next year, Wick said the agency was still determining whether to wait longer before pursuing another herbicide application.
“It’s still up in the air,” he said.
A long and contentious process
Lake managers and advocates for nearly 40 years have worked to fight the spread of invasive milfoil in numerous bays throughout the lake, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars each year on hand-harvesting techniques. In 2021, the commission proposed testing ProcellaCOR, at the time a new product garnering increased interest for its targeted use against milfoil. But shortly after merging with the Fund for Lake George, the Lake George Association raised concerns that the product had not been studied enough and challenged the commission’s herbicide plan.
That challenge, both in the courts and the court of public opinion, and the commission’s commitment to its plan has driven a wedge between the state agency charged with managing the lake and the well-heeled nonprofit committed to its protection.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
After years of litigation, a Warren County judge in June allowed the herbicide plan to move forward.
Opponents of the plan have argued that not enough is known about the long-term effects of its use on the environment and human health, despite government assurances that it’s safe. They said the consequences of the herbicide may not show up in initial water testing and plant surveys but will come to harm the lake. The LGA is conducting its own study of the demonstration bays, promising to release results of water sampling and plant and macroinvertebrate surveys.
A closer look at the impact
On Tuesday, Nick Rowell, a natural resource specialist with the conservation district, and Jake Dunkley, a district technician, donned scuba gear and dipped under the water’s surface with waterproof checklists of native plants. They explored the lake bottom, checking off plants they identified along the way. They also filmed the underwater plant community to present to the commission and public at future meetings.
“It’s wild looking down and actually seeing natives,” Dunkley said.
They said there were clear lines of demarcation between where the milfoil beds had been and the areas populated by native plants. As they return to survey the plant community in future years, they expect the native plants to gradually start to fill in the areas once dominated by milfoil. Since milfoil grows taller than many native plants and forms dense beds, its absence altered the feel of the lake to the divers.
“The bay feels so deep,” Rowell said.
The team was also joined by Jon Gosselin, an aquatics specialist in the northeast for SePro, the company that manufacturers ProcellaCOR, and Bob Bombard, who has also surveyed milfoil and native plants before and after herbicide treatments throughout Warren County.
Gosselin said the Lake George project has drawn more attention than most all proposed in the Northeast.
He said he wasn’t aware of a project with as much water sampling for the size of the herbicide application. They pulled up over 15 different native plant species at Jeliffe-Knight Bay, spreading them across the boat deck. Swimming around the bay, they identified turtles and a handful of fish species, including sunfish, pumpkinseed, bass, northern pike, perch and others.
Wick said he doesn’t expect to ever need to treat the two bays with ProcellaCOR again. The commission and the milfoil harvesters it contracts with will continue to check the bays for milfoil and remove any plants by hand.
Wick has said about a dozen bays around the lake would be candidates for ProcellaCOR use, areas with persistent and widespread milfoil infestations that have proved difficult to manage by hand. If the herbicide helps reduce the agency’s milfoil control budget, he said, that money can be shifted to green infrastructure, salt reduction, stream restoration, culvert replacements and other priorities.
“All of those opportunity costs come back on the table,” Wick said.
In nearby Sunset Bay, longstanding milfoil beds had grown up to a few feet from the water’s surface. The beds were thick with milfoil, which towers over other underwater plants. Small pockets of larger native plants squeezed into areas within the broader milfoil infestation, but many of the lower-lying native plants could not be seen from above.
Top photo: Native plants found in Lake George during an assessment of sites treated with an herbicide in June. Photo by Zachary Matson
Following our water resources
Keep up with Zach’s reporting by signing up for his free weekly “Water Line” newsletter
louis curth says
“Bringing back the native ecology, that’s exactly what the project is about,” Wick said. “Take the cancer out of the system and let the rest recover.”
I take it that Mr. Wick’s dismissive comment about cancer is meant to reassure everyone that we need not be concerned about possible health risks from application of the chemical herbicide ProcellaCor into the waters of Lake George. Dismissing concern about cancer also seems to mean we don’t need to obtain more information on possible long term side effects from this chemical, and further delay will only hold back the need to expand these herbicide treatments on Lake George.
Wick’s declaration comes just 30 days after completing a trial application of ProcellaCOR, and it is based upon just one trip out to assess two four-acre sample plots by divers. It is a bit unsettling to me that this initial sampling team included a representative of SePro, the chemical company that manufactures ProcellaCOR.
It seems like I’ve heard similar assurances that lowballed possible risks for too many products,-starting with that miracle chemical – DDT! Like most Americans, I like happy endings, but I also stopped believing in the tooth fairy a long time ago…
Thanks to Zach Matson and the Adk. Explorer for this follow-up report.
AdirondackAl says
Great news. Congratulations.
Todd Eastman says
Introducing that amount of decomposing organic material onto the lake bed will screw with the amounts of dissolved oxygen available to other species. Seems like a PR stunt to have a rep from the manufacturer on hand for this brief evaluation.
Mike says
A bit of a one-side puff piece here for Dave Wick and the LGPC. I dont think it was ever a question that this chemical would kill the weeds if done properly. No follow on to that it didnt really work in Blairs Bay as it was supposed to – aka “hoped it would work in the coming weeks”. No mention of applying the chemical wrong during a rainy, windy, cloudy day? No mention of rushing the application to fit the permit window even though the better time would have been early June for better results. No mentioned of the Vermont article from AE that has much more detail on how we should have handled this with more community involvement : https://www.adirondackexplorer.org/stories/vermont-denied-an-herbicide-permit-procellacor-for-largest-lake.
What is still very much in question is what are the long term effects from being exposed to the bi-product of the chemical? And what happens to the lake environment when the chemical drifts into deeper parts of the lake (like it did) and doesnt break down for longer periods of time?
In their own studies they showed tumor growth in rats after being exposed to large amounts. But we are being told this isnt in large amounts so not to be worried, its completely safe, drink it up. Do they have studies on long term, daily exposure in smaller amounts? They do not because this chemical is too new for any long term studies. What could possibly go wrong in 10 years. But hey, we saved a buck (not that much really either when you look at the cost of this small test) and made the chemical company a AA special rated, cleanest lake in the country, drinking water case study for them to make more money off…seems like a good trade off to me for some weeds that were not a problem to begin with.
Joan Grabe says
“ A good trade off to me for some weeds that were not a problem to begin with “ ???
Eurasian milfoil if left unchecked can absolutely ruin a lake. It grows quickly choking out native plants which causes the fish to die off . Upper Saranac Lake hand harvested milfoil over a number of years. First in tons , now in a few hundred lbs. This is the first year the water adjoining our land has not had buoys for the divers to use. I like this solution but Lake George is huge ! Different solutions for different situations.
Jim says
Glad to see something that works for a change.
franklin k whitson says
From Frank Whitson
A lake association in Minnesota has tried to cover areas of those non- native aquatic weeds with sheets of burlap, to block sunlight from the weeds.
When the weed are dead, the burlap is removed and divers remove the entire weed especially the roots.
I didn’t see how big their weed patches were.