By Brandon Loomis
The Adirondack Explorer heads into 2021 the same way we and inquiring readers begin every year: with lots of questions.
What will the Department of Environmental Conservation do about managing hikers and trails in the High Peaks? Will the Adirondack Mountain Reserve institute its own limits on access to these popular areas? We try not to make too many prediction in the news business, but it’s safe to say that the Explorer will follow this one closely over the coming months, and this important debate will make headlines. More than that, it’s a topic we intend to address with the in-depth, solutions-oriented reporting that such a focal point for the Adirondacks deserves.
We’re not done with road salt, either. Having spent much of 2020 chronicling the scourge and the state’s history of avoiding responsibility, next year will likely be about looking ahead. Gov. Andrew Cuomo recently signed a bill authorizing study and prioritization of road salt reduction, and we’ll follow where that leads.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
A key topic sure to arise early in the year is state funding for care of the Adirondack Park, its trails, trailheads, ranger force, water protections and other crucial programs. Cuomo started last year with a grand plan for billions in natural investments, but it fell apart after the coronavirus cast a shadow over state finances. That shadow has not lifted. What will it mean for our park’s resources and people?
The year is likely to bring some clarity to the question of what will become of Adirondack Club and Resort and Big Tupper Ski Area in Tupper Lake. With foreclosure looming over the controversial project in the last year, people have begun floating alternative ideas including public investments in the ski hill.
I asked our reporters to list some of the other topics you might expect to read about on our website and magazine. It’s by no means a full accounting of the news we’ll offer over the next 12 months, but here’s what came to mind:
Dams: They provide carbon-free energy, but they also bottle up rivers and can ruin them for fish. Aging dams are a major problem and dam safety records are often shrouded in mystery because of homeland security concerns. Unsafe dams pose a danger and impose costs on communities and we need to talk more about that, as well as their benefits, which help make power here so inexpensive.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
Septic tanks: Leaking septics are a widely known but poorly understood contributor to algal blooms and unsafe water. Around Lake George, state officials have largely thrown up their hands trying to deal with this long-known pollution source, allowing sewage to leak into the lake, which had its first major documented algal bloom in 2020.
Warming: Climate change is shaping and reshaping the world. How are the Adirondacks changing? What will our future winters – and winter economies – look like? How are they changing already?
Invasive species: Will the treatment of hemlock woolly adelgid succeed in rescuing these critical tree stands, and what will happen with the possible continued use of an herbicide to treat Eurasian watermilfoil, first done in Minerva Lake.
Green energy: A number of solar panel projects are making through APA processes. How will they affect our land and our carbon footprint?
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
Whitney estate: What will happen to the coveted 36,000-acre Long Lake property that many have hoped could end up as public property?
Here’s a question for 2021 – what will happen with the DEC’s appeal of the court decision related to tree cutting on the Forest Preserve? Protect the Adirondacks fought hard to convince the court that every vertical stem in the forest is “timber” and succeeded, and the result has been a complete moratorium on all tree cutting for the purpose of building trails or other facilities on state land. Even routine maintenance (brushing) of existing trails has been curtailed in response to the latest court decision. We heard that the appeal would happen in summer 2020 but that obviously was delayed, as with everything during the pandemic. There has been very little reporting on the subject over the past year. Will this be the 3rd year in a row where trail building and maintenance is not allowed?
The ADK pro crew use to accept money from DEC, and every year there were either more crews or bigger crews. Two summers ago, the NYS legislature passed a law that all state funded projects needed to pay their employees prevailing wages. Someone decided that since they work with wood and rocks that they were masons and carpenters. The prevailing wages for those professions are in the $60 – $70 per hour range. ADK had to quit taking money from the state, and consequently the pro crew has been much smaller. The money issue, still hasn’t been addressed. At a time when we trail maintenance more than ever, we have less.
One other thought. There are trails, that are poorly designed, or were never designed at all. It seems like DEC throws time and money at them, trying to mitigate erosion. They never appear to abandon them, and build intelligently designed trails. Some of the “trail less” high peaks should also have intelligently designed trails built on them. If you think those peaks are really trail less, try stepping 10 feet off to one side or the other. A couple of years ago DEC flew some lumber into the herd path on Gray, to try and make a tricky spot safer, does that make any sense? Since, we are seeing unprecedented use, with no end in sight, have somebody that knows what they are doing come up with some trails that can actually withstand the weather and millions of footsteps.
Question: At one time T-Lake Mountain lake(above Lake Piseco) was denuded of life due to acid rain from the West. Does T-Lake. Does T-Lake have fish in it now? And how healthy is it?