By Mike Lynch
Is a permit system necessary for controlling the number of hikers who use the High Peaks Wilderness?
Adirondack Wild, an environmental advocacy organization, says it’s a good idea and suggested the concept in its comment letter to the state Adirondack Park Agency and Department of Environmental Conservation regarding the recently proposed amendments to the High Peaks Wilderness unit management plan.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
“This huge influx of hikers and campers has been catastrophic to both natural resources and to the social and psychological carrying capacity of the (High Peaks Wilderness). Overuse of trails, campsites and summits has caused widespread and serious erosion, damaged and destroyed fragile alpine vegetation despite the heroic efforts of the Summit Stewards, and left areas littered with trash and human waste,” states the Adirondack Wild letter from Dan Plumley and Dave Gibson.
“Hordes of users eliminate the chance in many places that a hiker can experience ‘outstanding opportunities for solitude’ – one of the key aspects of wilderness defined in the (State Land Master Plan). Adirondack Wild contends that it is a violation of DEC’s responsibilities for care, custody and control of the Forest Preserve that, after failing to comply with the 1999 (High Peaks Wilderness) UMP directive to evaluate a permit system, the first significant amendment in twenty years fails to consider or even discuss implementation of a permit system despite the clear evidence of ongoing damage to the (High Peaks Wilderness).”
The group asked that the permit system be extended to Boreas Ponds and include both day users and overnight users.
In a press release today, Adirondack Wild noted that the 1999 High Peaks Wilderness management plan called for the DEC “to work with stakeholders and ‘develop the structure and implementation process’ for a permit system.”
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
The group says, “that management directive was never carried out.”
An out of state fee would make the most sense. All you see in the adirondacks from April until October is New Jersey and Connecticut license plates. That’s where all the congestion comes from, is from outsiders who dont pay the state taxes required to maintain the trails and wildlife
How about hiring more rangers, so they can educate these new hikers and train them up to be advocates for wild spaces? While they’re at it, drop the speed limit around the Cascade and Giant trailhead to 35 mph and spend some money trail hardening to stand up to the beating these trails are taking!
Of course the Adirondacks need better management and user permits. Overuse is happening because the State, local chambers of commerce, 4 color glossy magazines, resort businesses etc. market, market, market the Adirondacks day in and day out. Pretty pictures and the promise of wilderness and adventure has brought folks here. Permit fees would provide the means to pay for essential resource management.
I agree that a permit system is needed. A maximum of 20 permits per day, first come first serve and closing all approaches from the ADK lodge, the single largest destroyer of the high peaks in existence.