By Gwendolyn Craig
What’s old is new again when it comes to an advisory group report on managing increasing visitors in the Adirondack Park’s High Peaks. A permit system is also still part of the discussion.
The state Department of Environmental Conservation released a long-awaited report on Friday from the High Peaks Strategic Planning Advisory Group. The group was created to suggest long-term strategies for addressing public safety and protecting the environment on popular trails. Their work was completed when they turned over their final report.
But many of the suggestions in the final report circle back to already vetted National Park Service visitor management guides and multiple plans the DEC and the Adirondack Park Agency already created for the High Peaks, but have been slow to implement.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
There were some new recommendations in the report, such as creating a whole newly funded state entity to manage the increase in visitors. It’s unclear what new strategies, such as this one, might be implemented considering the state’s nearly $15 billion budget deficit.
“This is all going to take money in a year that it’s really hard to want to seek money,” said state Sen. Dan Stec, R-Queensbury, about managing visitor use in an interview on Thursday. “The 800-pound gorilla in the room is COVID and the pandemic, and recovering from that, and understandably, that’s got to be the top priority for all us.”
A permit system, a controversial topic among advocacy groups, hikers and state officials, was part of the report as something to “be investigated as an option to limit use.” In some ways, the report suggests, that will happen already through stricter parking enforcement and visitor shuttle use “based on the allowable capacity for the trails.” The report also details a possible parking pass scenario where current trailhead parking could be limited to pass-holders. Scenic overlook parking would be available for short-term spots.
A recommendation from the group’s interim report was carried over for conducting a three-year pilot program that would limit use on private lands. It’s not clear which private property owner might conduct the pilot, though the Ausable Club and the Adirondack Mountain Reserve had said last year they were considering limiting the number of hikers on their property.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
Basil Seggos, commissioner of the state Department of Environmental Conservation, said in a news release about the report that the uptick in visitors, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, made it “critical that DEC and our partners work together to protect these irreplaceable lands for future generations.”
In a letter to the advisory group, Seggos said DEC is developing a plan to form such an entity as the advisory group has proposed for managing overuse. There is little detail, other than that DEC would “provide further detail shortly.”
Seggos said the DEC has already started to adopt National Park Service guidelines for visitor management. The APA is also using this, and is expected to present its own visitor use guidelines next week.
Seggos did not specifically comment on permits. In the past, Seggos has said the state will look at a permit system as a last resort, which Stec said he has heard, too, from the commissioner.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
Chad Dawson, a former APA board member and expert on natural resource management and recreation, said DEC and APA will have to carefully vet what recommendations in the report mesh with the legal documents to which they are bound.
“You never take an advisory group and just implement,” Dawson said earlier this week.
Here are more of the advisory group’s recommendations:
- Create a new outdoor recreation unit within the DEC;
- Collect real-time data on visitors to determine a carrying capacity of trails and parking areas;
- Study parking and shuttle management;
- Provide more resources and funding; and
- Implement actions already highlighted in state unit management plans. Those are legal documents DEC and APA have already created with projects and regulations tailored to specific areas within the Adirondack Park.
The advisory group’s report highlights some unaccomplished action items in the High Peaks’s unit management plan created in 1999. For example, the advisory group suggests DEC “establish an Area Manager to oversee and coordinate all management activities.” It also highlights action items listed in a 2018 amendment that the group thinks the DEC should pursue including:
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
- A monitoring program for any new facility built;
- Promulgate regulations proposed in the unit management plan;
- Add forest rangers;
- Develop better parking at Chapel Pond, Ridge Trail and the Round Pond Corridor on Route 73;
- Work on parking opportunities with the Adirondack Mountain Reserve, a private conservation easement that is a gateway to nearly a dozen High Peaks; and
- Establish photo monitoring points of the new Cascade Mountain Trail.
For more on creating a new state entity, the report suggests recruiting a third-party, like The Leave No Trace Center for Outdoor Ethics, to create a management plan. The Adirondack Advisory Group, as the report calls it, would establish thresholds through this plan for things like wildlife, vegetation, remoteness and solitude.
Some efforts outlined in the report, the DEC said, are already underway. For example, DEC staff and New York State Police are enforcing parking regulations on Route 73, the popular thoroughfare to the High Peaks.
The DEC is also partnering with Essex County and the Town of Keene to develop more front country infrastructure, including a pilot shuttle service on Route 73 and help with handling human waste issues.
Seggos and the DEC will continue to review the final recommendations.
In a letter to the advisory group, Seggos said he will continue to look for “opportunities for implementation of the full set of recommendations in the report.” Of the new ones proposed, it’s not clear which, if any, will be implemented.
Vanessa says
Thanks for this summary Gwen – it helps me coalesce around a conclusion that I wasn’t 100% ready to draw yet: this seems like a tacit admission that present stakeholders can’t actually do that much to solve any problems. As in, they either don’t have the power or are hesitant to act. If you deliberate for a year and conclude that you still need data and a new committee, you’re still in what we call at work the “discovery phase.” Implementation is years away…
…so we’ve kicked the can down the road, essentially. And please know that I say this not to be blindly critical. I am 100% sympathetic to the tough task and unreasonable expectations this team was operating under. Some recommendations are easy enough. By all means, get the electric shuttle and enforce parking. A pilot permit system is a lot less of a PITA than attempting to form a new govt agency. (With the caveat that I still don’t think complete enforcement for a permit system is possible.)
But I worry that this is going to become a Groundhog Day type topic. I’m all for government solving problems – I think I differ significantly from local political leadership in this respect (Mr. Stec, perhaps) – but government should strive to be efficient. What will give the new advisory group the power to make the policy decisions that this one could not? That should be made very clear before we start down the path.
nathan says
The idea of limiting parking and using shuttles is definitely needed. The are times along certain roads where people park along the shoulders for 1/4 mile or more on both sides. destroying all the vegetation, creating wash out of road edges, and mud and pollutants flowing into streams. But it gets to where the roads are narrowed to less than 2 lanes, creating very unsafe conditions. I have come to a corner and as i come around suddenly to have both edges of road blocked and narrowed, kids, pets and blocked road. when speed limits are 55 and come around curve to slam brakes because of foolishparking and unwatched kids in road as parents unload backpacks. I have thought for years they need to tow any cars parking on edges of the road, if you cannot pull completely off road, dont park there. from Keene to Placid the road has become so over parked in areas with cars parked along road that i am amazed some kids haven’t been killed yet. shuttle buss from keene in summer, and maybe from white face parking lots. but the trails are being over used, people need to be redirected to use other trails. The trails are at point of needing to be closed a year and major fixing , log bridges, washout areas, drained and refilled.
I absolutely hate the idea of requiring permits. But the situation is unsafe, unsustainanble. more staff is needed, maybe volunteers. enforcement at key parking lots~redirect people to shuttle lots, unload backpacks, then go to shuttle lot. If needed tow parked car from along road.
Joseph says
As the other commenter Nathan said, the parking situation along Rt 73 is a clear and present danger. Rt 73 has a 55 MPH speed limit, and the cars parking on the roadside narrow the road to an uncomfortable level. Someone is eventually going to get killed if it is not addressed somehow.
Bill says
Seems like a lot of bureaucracy and extra steps to adjust what is, at its core, a parking problem. The way you solve a parking problem is to add more parking. Hardly anyone in the high peaks is backpacking, they are just day hiking. So there’s no environmental reason to limit use. Just add some freaking parking.
Anthony Russo says
I look at this as a civil liberties issue. Are these not public spaces and/or public travel corridors? To me , this is a slippery slope when the government can limit access to public spaces because of overcrowding.
That said, environmental degradation of sensitive areas is a very real concern, but setting a precedent of restricting access to public spaces does not seem to be the way to best address this.
I am wondering if anyone with legal knowledge has any idea how this would play out in future challenges in the courts.