3 responses to “County official protests to governor”

• 

  Robert May 23rd, 2010 at 23:23

  Moose River Recreation Area was a GIFT to NYS
  by Gould Paper Co. in 1963- under a specific provision that this 51,000 acre parcel be acquired for the purpose of Fish and Game management.
  The disposition of this property and 26.2 mile of gravel roads went into legal dispute
  and ended in 1966, as this land is classified as State property, but NOT FOREST PRESERVE, due to the type of purchase (GIFT)that was made with Gould owners that
  guaranteed them that the state would have to maintain the road system to enable sportsmen access to the interior.
  The legality of this agreement was upheld in
  1966 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York under Section 361 of the Conservation Law. The 26.2 miles of private roads were aquired as a GIFT for the purpose of fish and
  wildlife management and that Section 361 provided that property SO ACQUIRED, SHALL NOT
  BECOME part of the Forest Preserve. This law
  permitted lands and waters to be accepted and held for use of the Division of Fish and Game
  later to become the DEC and to be improved or developed as the dept. deemed best.

  Untold numbers of recreationalists have been going to Moose River Recreation Area continuously since it first opened in 1964 for Camping and fishing in the summer months to hiking and hunting in the fall.
  I’ve seen the number of registrants peak at
  nearly 40,000 in 1971,( and this is not an exact number for many never sign the registration book)- BUT as the upkeep on
  the very basic campsites began to deteriorate – so did the big numbers coming into the area. Originally the campsite privies were moved periodically and the old pits filled in. Tables left out winters and
  summers were replaced now and then, and with
  the exception of the gravel roads repaired
  in the spring before opening and any washouts
  checked over the summer – little if anything
  was done to improve upon property given as a GIFT to the SPORTSMEN and worth hundreds of millions of dollars in Adirondack real estate
  to the State of New York. The deteriorated privies became a health issue and many failed to come back because of this.

  This property is unique and unlike ANY property in New York State. The remote interior is here available to not only the
  average citizen, but older citizens and those
  that are disabled that will be denied access to this land that was given to them as a gift for posterity – and all because our political leadership in Albany cannot run OUR government efficiently and in the Black – the very job they were elected to do.
  NOW, they want those that pay their salaries and the “freight” for our entire state – to be denied what was given to them as a gift- and with the only restriction
  implied – that it would always remain open
  for the people to have access to.
  This is the very least that should be expected from our leadership.
  Owe up to your obligations Albany – to not only the people that voted you in and pay your salaries – but to the promises made by those who sat in the seats you now fill – and shook hands in acceptance of such a magnanimous and truly beneficial gift -
  the likes of which New York will never see again !

  In the values derived – it costs little to
  keep Moose River Recreation Area open by
  comparisons. The towns of Old Forge, Eagle Bay, Inlet, Raquette Lake and Indian Lake
  all have their economies aided by those that
  come there to enjoy the beauty and the
  recreational benefits of this remote NYS interior. In this economy Albany should be
  doing all it can to promote tourism and
  recreational availability. The area is already
  here = utilize it don’t close it! If you do
  and it goes without road repairs for and
  extended time frame – the cost will more than
  double. THIS is definately not cost effective !

• 

  Paul May 12th, 2010 at 16:26

  Sorry correction: “log” the land not “long” the land.

• 

  Paul May 12th, 2010 at 16:26

  The other way to pay for it is to long the land. I bet the timber on this land has matured nicely over the past 45 years. Let’s get in there and make the property pay it’s own bills? Many private landowners cover expenses by logging their land we should be doing the same thing on FP land. Letting all that wood rot on the stump is a shame. It has been shown that a managed forest sequesters more carbon per acre than a mature stand. It’s good for the taxpayers, it’s good for the planet. Don’t listen to these arguments that a forest cannot be managed for timber and recreation, even the Nature Conservancy has embraced the idea in the Adirondacks.