Comments on: Lyon Mountain: Wilderness or Wild Forest?

By: cheap mobile phone plans

cheap mobile phone plans — Sat, 29 Oct 2011 00:23:56 +0000

Very good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve truly enjoyed surfing about your weblog posts. Soon after all I is going to be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again quite soon!

By: Manuel Leithiser

Manuel Leithiser — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:29:43 +0000

I have seen that car insurance organizations know the motors which are at risk from accidents as well as other risks. Additionally, these people know what kind of cars are prone to higher risk plus the higher risk they have the higher your premium fee. Understanding the very simple basics connected with car insurance will allow you to choose the right types of insurance policy that will take care of your wants in case you get involved in any accident. Thank you for sharing the particular ideas for your blog.

By: turystyczne pieninach

turystyczne pieninach — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:27:52 +0000

I would like to say thank you to the author. The article is awesome.

By: Phil

Phil — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:09:40 +0000

I don’t know what would happen to the High Banks road. I don’t know if the council has worked out its proposal to that level of specificity.

By: tourpro

tourpro — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:24:25 +0000

I guess I have no problem with putting the trailhead at Chazy Lk Rd.

There’s an old road from High Banks that connects to the existing snowmobile trail. Will this be included as part of the Wild Forest Rec Corridor if designated Wilderness?

By: jim

jim — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:20:11 +0000

I have lived in the area all of my life. I can see the fire tower from my home. This is part of the history of our area. LEAVE IT ALONE! We live here year around, and the impact from not allowing recreation vehicles on this land will hurt our local area businesses. Hopefully the APA people will see it our way as we are full time residents and not just weekend tourists

By: Normandy

Normandy — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:32:20 +0000

I think wild forest is appropriate for this tract. Its setting will not provide the remoteness and solitude a wilderness should have. I agree with the poster above that Brian Houseal’s argument is a really bad one. “There is no wilderness in that part of the park”. That doesn’t mean there needs to be one. The state land master plan doesn’t define wilderness by where it is in relation to the park and other wilderness areas. The APA was right to not fight for wilderness here and save the fight for more appropriate areas.

By: Phil

Phil — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:32:34 +0000

TourPro, I am referring to the milelong access road from the highway to the parking lot. If the tract were classified Wilderness, I assume that road would be closed.

By: tourpro

tourpro — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:50:24 +0000

The access road is not exactly open to the public. Is it? I think it is for access to the transmitters up there.

Agree that fire tower should remain, if it can be maintained in safe condition.

By: tourpro

tourpro — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:10:04 +0000

Pretty complicated issue here which is related to the Sable Highlands deal. Last meeting regarding the plan was packed with almost every user-group you can imagine. The plan as presented won’t be implemented for years due to lack of funding.

Personally, I’d like to see a large tract of primitive/wilderness.